Because lawmakers are dumbfounded, it is expected that much of the responsibility for abortion rights will fall on medical and activist groups that open abortion clinics near airports and at state borders, creating channels to distribute abortion pills in states. who have banned them or plan to do so. thus, and raising millions to help patients travel outside the state for the procedure.

Democratic officials on Tuesday did not formulate a clear strategy for bills or executive action to strengthen abortion rights ahead of the expected June decision, but stressed the need to use outrage to go to the polls in November.

“What happened last night, I am angry. “I’m furious,” Kansas spokeswoman Christina Hasswood said at an event in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday. “We may be angry, but we really need your help in this election.”

The Senate majority whip Dick Durbin repeated the message, telling reporters: “The answer will be in November.”

The by-elections focus on the tacit acknowledgment that while Democrats hold power – controlling the White House, both houses of Congress, 22 mansions of governors and 18 state legislatures – they are still unable to defend much of the country the right to abortion.

Lawmakers and advocacy groups on both sides are fighting for abortion suggested since the Supreme Court ruled last year on a 15-week ban on abortions in the Mississippi, judges will use the case to overturn Rowe vs. Wadethe suspicion is heightened Oral arguments of December on the case. But the draft conclusion still came as a shock to abortion advocates.

“Seeing it in black and white is different than being warned for years and decades,” said Elizabeth Nash, interim deputy director for state affairs at the Gutmacher Institute. “It’s not unexpected, but, nonetheless, it’s a serious blow.”

Now that significant government action is unlikely, many Democrats are disappointed that their own colleagues and the public have not mobilized before to introduce greater protections.

“No one believed us,” the senator said. Kirsten Gilibrand (DN.Y.) said POLITICO. “For the past 10 years, women have been telling the nation that these ultra-conservative judges have always had the ambition to undermine reproductive freedom.”

Although some actions are underway, many are symbolic with little chance of making changes or protecting reproductive rights. Leader of the majority in the Senate Chuck Sumer awaits another vote on a bill banning states from imposing new abortion bans. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer filed a lawsuit last month, challenging nearly a century-old abortion ban.

These steps are unlikely to succeed, despite Rowe’s continued support.

Saint. Joe Manchin (DW.Va.) on Tuesday made it clear that his long-held views against abortion rights have not been changed by a possible fall Caviarwhich means Democrats don’t even have 50 votes in the Senate to take measures to protect abortion rights, let alone the 60 they currently need to overcome the filibuster.

“I’m not ashamed of where I stand,” Manchin told reporters. “I think I’ve been clear for the last 40 years.”

And while several Democrats reacted to the news of the Supreme Court, calling for the abolition of the Senate, both Manchin and Sen. Kirsten Cinema (D-Ariz.) Also reiterated that they oppose such a move.

If the Democrats held a vote in February this year on Women’s Health Act – A bill banning states from imposing new restrictions on abortion – it received only 46 votes. The party’s efforts to lift decades of a ban on federal abortion funding also exhausted in the Senate after passing the House of Representatives, and the top Democrats retreated before the opposition Republican Party before it went to the polls.

Because a strongly divided Congress has long been unable to adopt new restrictions or remedies, many progressive supporters said Tuesday that they are instead dependent on state and local officials to take action before the Supreme Court makes its final decision. .

“On days like today, there seems to be hope in the states, right?” Emily Kane, CEO of EMILY’s List, said at the group’s annual conference. “When we think of governors and state legislatures … we’re going to help make sure they’re there to keep the line on women’s reproductive freedom.”

But instead of announcing a new ambitious policy to protect access to abortion after Monday’s news, many Democratic governors in various states are vying for re-election this year, including Whitmer, Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak and Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, have exposed themselves as the only one standing between their constituents and restrictive abortion laws.

Several passed the baton to Congress, writing a letter to the Democratic leadership on Tuesday afternoon urging the Senate to take steps to codify Caviar in law.

“Congress needs to act quickly to ensure that all Americans continue to have significant access to reproductive health and abortion,” the governors wrote in a letter first published in POLITICO.

Of the 21 states with a Democrat governor, a third have already completed their legislative sessions or have not met this year. And many of those states that are still in the legislative session – including Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan and Kansas – have the legislatures of the majority of the Republican Party not interested in protecting abortion rights.

However, not all states were idle.

California has passed a number of bills to expand legal protections for both state residents and patients coming from other parts of the country, expand financial aid to people who want to have an abortion, and better fund clinics and staff who perform the procedure.

New York State Democrats pushing the bill create a fund for access to abortion, which will be paid by state taxpayers through voluntary contributions to the declaration of income of individuals.

Oregon founded the $ 15 million Reproductive Health Equity Foundation, Maryland and Connecticut passed a law that allows nurses and physician assistants to perform abortions, and Colorado passed the Reproductive Health Act, which ensures that pregnant women in the state have the right to choose pregnancy.

Nash of the Guttmacher Institute said that while she supports taking legal protection against abortion where possible, states can take other measures to increase access to abortion, including helping expand the number of abortion providers and clinics in their states. requiring health insurance. plans to cover abortion and directly allocate public dollars to fund abortion-related travel.

“States should put their money where their mouth is because patients need it,” she said.

However, as most states are unable to protect the millions of women who will soon be severely restricted to abortion, medical and activist groups are filling the void.

Women’s health and planned parenting are opening abortion clinics near airports and at state borders to receive travelers from states that are expected to quickly ban abortions. Plan C, access to assistance and other groups tuning channels distribute abortion pills in states that have banned or plan to ban them, and mass and national organizations are raising millions to help low-income patients pay for abortions and travel expenses.

“Abortion funds exist and have always existed to fill the gap that needs to be filled by the basic social protection network from our government,” said POLITICO Debasry Ghosh, Managing Director of the National Network of Abortion Funds.

Gosh’s group received such a massive flow of donations Monday night that their site broke down, although by Tuesday it had been restored. She said that although the draft opinion was “sustained”, it was what she expected, and groups like her are not going to wait for a government response.

“People even out Caviar the intact did not have significant access to abortions, ”she said. “Literally that’s why we exist. And we know that the need has grown and will increase. “

Previous articleAngus O’Brien will rejoin the Dragons from Scarlets
Next articleA wild Nordic chatter with a serious message