Amber Heard’s insurance company is REFUSING to cover part of the $8 million in damages she owes ex-husband Johnny Depp because her defamation was ‘deliberate and malicious’

  • Amber Heard’s insurance company is refusing to cover part of the $8.3 million in damages the actress owes ex-husband Johnny Depp following a defamation lawsuit.
  • Hurd had a $1 million liability policy with New York Marine and General Insurance Company, which she hoped might cover some of the damage
  • The insurance company says it could deny a million-dollar payout if Heard is found to have committed “willful” wrongdoing, and wants a judge to agree
  • On Friday, Hurd’s lawyers filed a second document seeking a retrial, arguing that the wrong person was on the jury
  • The lawyers said that a 77-year-old man was selected as a juror, but was replaced by a 52-year-old man with the same surname and address.
  • Heard’s lawyers said her “right to a jury trial and due process” was “undermined and compromised”
  • They added: “In the circumstances the trial must be set aside and a new trial ordered.”
  • He did not say how the error was discovered, and he did not name the two jurors

Amber HeardInsurance company refuses to cover part of $8.3 million in damages owed to ex-husband Johnny Depp after a libel trial in May.

Heard had a $1 million liability policy with New York Marine and General Insurance Company, which she hoped could cover at least part of the damages bill she would have to pay.

The policy covers wrongful conduct of all kinds, including defamation, but there is a clause that would likely result in the insurance company refusing to pay out, according to TMZ.

Under California the law of the state in which the insurance policy was issued, the company says it has the option to refuse a million-dollar payout if Hurd is found to have committed a “willful” violation.

New York Marine Company says the judge found Amber’s defamation “willful” and “malicious” in his decision.

Now the insurance company wants a judge to declare that they are not going to pay Amber’s portion of the bill based on the policy.

Amber Heard’s insurance company refuses to cover part of the $8.3 million in damages the actress owes ex-husband Johnny Depp after a defamation lawsuit in May

The aftermath of the showdown is still reverberating HeardOn Friday, her lawyers requested a new trial in her defamation fight, arguing that the wrong person served on the jury and ruled against her.

Hurd’s team filed documents with the court Virginia “based on additional facts discovered,” they said.

Her attorneys say two people with the same last name lived in the Virginia home where the grand jury was served in April.

A 77-year-old man was supposed to be summoned, but a 52-year-old man who was a juror appeared in court instead.

“For someone who has not been summoned to appear on a jury to appear on a jury and serve on a jury is of great concern, especially in this case,” they write.

On June 1, Johnny Depp was awarded $10 million in damages and $5 million in fines.

On June 1, Johnny Depp was awarded $10 million in damages and $5 million in fines.

Fans of Depp, 59, are pictured outside a courtroom in Fairfax, Virginia on April 25.

Fans of Depp, 59, are pictured outside a courtroom in Fairfax, Virginia on April 25.

The document notes that Virginia has safeguards in place to prevent such errors, such as using a seven-digit juror number, zip code and date of birth to verify jurors’ identities.

Depp is seen on July 6 on tour with his band in Germany

Depp is seen on July 6 on tour with his band in Germany

“These safeguards exist and are relied upon by the parties to verify the identity of the correct juror to ensure due process and a fair trial for all litigants,” the statement said.

“When these safeguards are circumvented or not enforced, as appears to be the case here, the right to a jury trial and due process are undermined and jeopardized.

“Under the circumstances, the trial must be quashed and a new trial ordered.”

The document did not indicate any reason why this allegedly happened, nor how to expose the situation.

Friday’s filing comes after the actress’ legal team said on July 1 that the verdict was not supported by the evidence presented during the six-week hearing.

The July 1 document outlined the issue of the “wrong” juror 15, but did not go into as much detail as Friday’s document.

Depp is suing his ex-partner over an article she wrote for the Washington Post in 2018 about her experiences of domestic violence in which his lawyers say he was falsely accused of rape.

On June 1, the jury ruled in his favor.

Last week, Hurd’s lawyers also said the judge should throw out the verdict because the amount awarded to Depp — $10 million in damages and $5 million in punitive damages — was “excessive” and “unwarranted.”

She received 2 million dollars.

Advertising



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10997107/Amber-Heard-insurance-REFUSES-cover-8M-damages-owes-ex-husband-Johnny-Depp.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Previous articleCrossword Cybersecurity’s Identiproof Demonstrates Early Commitment to Open Badges V3 at Jobs for the Future Plugfest –
Next articleEmergency support for people fleeing Ukraine and entering the UK with their pets